Film profile
- Title, year, category and runtime
- Country, language and filmmaker location
- Completion date and festival run start
FestForge starts with the details of your film, then compares them with festival data: rules, deadlines, fees, locations, accreditations, genre fit and evidence quality. The result is a practical route that explains where to submit, what to avoid and what needs a final manual check before you spend.
The creative, practical and strategic context you enter.
Deadlines, fees, rules, categories, locations and source confidence.
Eligibility, value, prestige, niche fit, budget fit and risk.
Ranked targets, warnings, budget allocation and timeline.
A useful recommendation needs more than a title and genre. FestForge asks for the information that changes festival fit: format, runtime, premiere position, creative signals, budget, travel preference and what success should mean for this run.
The matching step is not just category lookup. The system checks whether the festival is open, whether the film appears eligible, whether the deadline stage makes sense and whether the evidence is strong enough to trust without a caution note.
Runtime limits, film type, screenplay-only competitions, student categories and premiere requirements are checked before a festival becomes a serious candidate.
Festival profile text, category labels, genre tags, identity-specific signals and accreditation pathways help separate broad acceptance from real strategic fit.
Entry fees are compared with your festival submission budget so the route can mix realistic targets, prestige bets and lower-fee options without spending blindly.
Deadlines, open dates, approximate timing, last-checked information and low-confidence data are surfaced before they become expensive surprises.
Every festival candidate is pulled through a set of practical checks. Some add weight, some create warnings and some remove a festival from the route entirely.
Does the festival appear to accept this format and length?
Could world, international, national or regional premiere rules create a problem?
Is the festival genuinely specialist, or only broadly open to the genre?
Does the festival carry useful qualifying or accreditation signals?
Should the plan lean local, national, international or a mixed route?
Is the next chance early, regular, late or final, and what does that do to value?
Does the opportunity justify the fee and its place in the shortlist?
Is the evidence fresh enough, or should it be treated with caution?
The output is designed to make the submission run easier to manage: what to prioritise, how to protect the budget, when to act and where to slow down because the rules need verification.
A submission order that puts the strongest opportunities first instead of handing you a raw database list.
Prestige long shots, realistic targets, affordable good-value festivals and caution items, with awards and genre fit shown as tags.
Recommended application timing, current and next deadline stages, event dates and deadline pressure warnings.
Premiere conflicts, expensive fees, incomplete locations, low-confidence data and rules that should be verified before paying.
Festival information changes, so FestForge marks uncertainty instead of hiding it. The report gives you a structured route and clear warnings, then leaves the final submission decision with you.