Three sample briefs
Switch between a UK short, a feature documentary and a horror feature to see different strategy logic.
This page shows the shape of a FestForge report: a short film brief, a ranked submission route, budget logic, deadline pressure, confidence notes and a clear next action for each festival.
The examples are fictional planning briefs. They are here to show how recommendations change when the film type, budget and festival goals change.
Switch between a UK short, a feature documentary and a horror feature to see different strategy logic.
Each sample handles submission spend differently instead of pretending one fixed budget fits every film.
The preview shows the same kind of buckets, reasons, warnings and actions a filmmaker should expect.
Switch between three different film briefs to see how the route changes with budget, format, premiere status and audience fit.
A polished short with a moderate submission budget. The route protects enough spend for UK short-film festivals while leaving room for a few international prestige submissions.
Short-film focus, strong UK reputation and useful accreditation pathway if current rules fit.
Dedicated short and animation festival with credible industry attention; check premiere and call status.
Clear home-market audience for UK shorts and a stronger fit than a broad general festival.
Short-focused programme, suitable runtime fit and useful second-wave UK positioning.
Good wider festival route with short-film pathways; confirm the specific category and fee window.
High-value short showcase, but more competitive and less essential if travel budget is tight.
Major short-film platform; useful if the campaign can absorb a higher-competition US submission.
| Bucket | Festival | Reason | Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| Prestige UK route | Aesthetica Short Film Festival | Short-film focus, strong UK reputation and useful accreditation pathway if current rules fit. | Hold budget |
| Prestige UK route | Encounters Film Festival | Dedicated short and animation festival with credible industry attention; check premiere and call status. | Submit |
| Realistic UK target | London Short Film Festival | Clear home-market audience for UK shorts and a stronger fit than a broad general festival. | Submit |
| Realistic UK target | Glasgow Short Film Festival | Short-focused programme, suitable runtime fit and useful second-wave UK positioning. | Submit |
| Broader UK festival | Leeds International Film Festival | Good wider festival route with short-film pathways; confirm the specific category and fee window. | Submit |
| International reach | Palm Springs International ShortFest | High-value short showcase, but more competitive and less essential if travel budget is tight. | Consider |
| International reach | HollyShorts Film Festival | Major short-film platform; useful if the campaign can absorb a higher-competition US submission. | Consider |
The preview above is deliberately compact. A full report uses the same structure, but gives more detail on why a festival was included, what could make it risky and how it fits into the overall submission run.
Runtime, country, genre, premiere status, budget, goals and timing assumptions.
Recommended festivals grouped by prestige reach, realistic target, specialist fit and caution.
Which fees are worth holding budget for and which lower-value submissions should wait.
Current deadline stage, next deadline, late-fee pressure and open-call checks.
Premiere rules, category fit, stale source data, missing fees and unclear eligibility.
Submit, hold budget, verify rules, consider later or skip.
| Report section | Purpose | What it covers |
|---|---|---|
| Film brief | The film details that shaped the route | Runtime, country, genre, premiere status, budget, goals and timing assumptions. |
| Ranked shortlist | What to submit to first | Recommended festivals grouped by prestige reach, realistic target, specialist fit and caution. |
| Budget allocation | How the submission spend is protected | Which fees are worth holding budget for and which lower-value submissions should wait. |
| Deadline timeline | When to act | Current deadline stage, next deadline, late-fee pressure and open-call checks. |
| Risk and confidence | What to verify before paying | Premiere rules, category fit, stale source data, missing fees and unclear eligibility. |
| Next actions | The practical instruction | Submit, hold budget, verify rules, consider later or skip. |
Festival information changes. A useful report should say when fees, deadlines, premiere rules or category details need review before you submit.